Norway Footballer Lise Klaveness is aware that her chances of being elected to the executive committee are slim. Lise Klaveness recalls her style of play while earning 73 caps for Norway. Women Football World Cup fans can buy Norway vs Philippines Tickets from our website.
“I was always really fond of the ball and I was definitely a No 10,” she says.
Although having played as a No. 6, I didn’t enjoy it. I desired to take chances. My tremendous appetite for risk led the coaches to decide to utilize me as an offensive midfielder. The 41-year-old Norway Footballer Lise Klaveness, who is also a lawyer and a judge, delivered a scathing address at the Fifa congress in Doha last March in which she asked that football officials support migrant workers in Qatar, safeguard LGBTQ+ World Cup attendees, and make the game accessible to all.
Klaveness, a lesbian who is happily married to former Norwegian international Ingrid Fosse Saethre, Could have been imprisoned in accordance with Qatari legislation. But she claims that her personal safety was not in danger.
Klaveness is currently vying for a position on the Uefa executive council. At a time when the European regulatory body is in crisis and weak in morale. The recent independent investigation into last year’s nearly catastrophic Champions League final demonstrated leadership.
She has chosen to forego running for the female quota seat instead, which is a riskier course of action. Instead, Klaveness will run against male administrators in the April election for one of the seven available positions.
FIFA Executive Committee:
France’s Florence Hardouin now holds the quota place, but Klaveness claims that “blocking another woman” would be discouraging. I was given a lot of advice to run for the female seat. Since it has a lower bar and is therefore “easier to win,” I must walk the walk if I want to succeed.”
Klaveness acknowledges that her moral choice significantly decreased her prospects of winning the election.
“Even though it’s challenging, I’ll keep trying. Many tell me it’s too difficult and that I’m impatient, but I see it as a responsibility since I can aid in the growth of girls and women’s football and the establishment of stronger grassroots clubs in many nations.
She has a wealth of experience, having served as the only female technical director of a national men’s and women’s football team in world football. From 2018 until 2022, Klaveness served as Norway’s technical director and collaborated with three of the top footballers in Europe: Erling Haaland, Martin Daegaard, and Ada Hegerberg.
I have a technical background. Even when I was approached to serve as a television analyst for women’s soccer. I responded right away,
“I also have to work with men’s football.”
I, therefore, watched the Women’s World Cup, the Premier League, and the World Cup for men. FIFA Women’s Football World Cup fans can buy Switzerland vs Norway Tickets from our website.
“It has always been very essential to me that the men’s and women’s sports do not compete with one another. Also, I gained tremendous operational experience when I had the honor of leading the men’s and women’s national teams. One of the main motives behind my candidature for exco is this.
Klaveness supports grassroots football
The game is quite divided between men and women. So having a foot in each camp is helpful, as they say in English. Along with supporting individuals playing on the periphery of a lucrative game, Klaveness is a big proponent of the sustainability of grassroots football. When you’re so big, she tells the elite power brokers in Europe.
“You also have the ability to exclude. Thus, we require leaders that wish to open up football to all people. At these extremely frightening geopolitical times, if we don’t act in this way, we will lose all moral authority.”
Her moral conscience, skill, and brilliance are all evident. It is regrettable that Klaveness is hesitant to speak about the shocking news from last week about the mayhem of the 2022 Champions League final, which endangered thousands of lives at the Stade de France. I have to compel her to offer an opinion on a study that Uefa itself commissioned.
Of course, it is politically wise to refrain from criticizing the government any further while she is running for office, Nonetheless, Klaveness concedes in a follow-up interview that we must address the conclusions that Uefa is “primarily responsible” for the apparent organizational and safety flaws that so almost resulted in catastrophe.
That evening, Klaveness was outside the stadium. She recalls, “It was almost like we were in this trap.”
UEFA Champions League Final:
“Older folks had to be carried over a fence. We observed the area where supporters had been packed in during the terrible event. Everyone was pleased that no lives were lost because it was a little out of control. Thus, I was not shocked when Uefa and the host committed mistakes. You were there to witness it. But, based on our talks, it appears that [UEFA] is aware of those mistakes and trying to analyse what happened.”
What does Klaveness think of the damning fundamental claim of the report—that Uefa has “marginalized” its own safety and security unit, which has been led since 2021 by Zeljko Pavlica. A close friend of the organization’s president, Aleksander Ceferin—that is made by the report? The investigation concluded that the unit had no meaningful influence on the final’s preparation or administration.
“The entire study is obviously upsetting,” she adds.
“But, I’m not in a position to make a personal judgement on that. It’s crucial that Uefa analyses the study and responds to these questions. I’ll hold off till then.”
I questioned Klaveness if Ceferin’s pick of Pavlica indicated that Uefa was plagued with cronyism when we first met, before reading the report. She changed to another subject.
“From my perspective, Ceferin was quite influential in the Super League conversation. It was essential for the lesser nations and the overall structure of European football.”
Clearly, it was European fans, not Ceferin, who put an end to Super League plans?”
“It was undoubtedly a grassroots uprising, proving that money is not the only source of power, as Klaveness admits.”
“But Uefa and Ceferin took decisive action.”
Norway Footballer Lise Klaveness
It is disgraceful that Ceferin did not face any leadership challenges in the April elections, particularly given that he is ultimately in charge of Uefa and its signature event, the Champions League final. The manner Uefa’s executives attempted to dodge responsibility is called “reprehensible” in the study.
According to Klaveness, “one of the most significant things in the investigation was how [Liverpool] supporters were [incorrectly] accused.”
“That was awful, and the first error was to point the finger at the supporters. Uefa apologised to fans, which is commendable.”
When questioned about the requirement to recognize Ceferin’s accountability, Klaveness is circumspect.
She responds, “I’m not saying nobody should be held accountable, but I come from the standpoint of being a lawyer and a judge. Because we will ultimately hold people accountable, the media is interested in the names we are naming today. Yet, it’s crucial that you do due diligence, and we discuss how to improve the system. The proposals in the study pique my curiosity because of this.”
In its statement so far, the governing body has been absurdly evasive:
“Uefa is presently evaluating the findings of the review and assessing them against its own understanding of the organization of the event and circumstances that occurred around it.”
“I will wait for Uefa’s [full] response to this report, which is not a court ruling, emphasises Klaveness. Despite the fact that the report is so thorough, it is not a verdict. The statement from Uefa is still pending and ought to be quite clear.”
Klaveness about UEFA:
For a scary moment, Klaveness seems to be saying that Uefa’s response will provide the final judgment. She responds, “Oh, no. But they have to respond now because the study contains 21 suggestions. It’s crucial that people accept responsibility and have faith.
Klaveness can aid in purging Uefa of some of the evils that plague the organization. Even if electioneering restricts her customary ability to speak without restraint. Particularly in a campaign that is stacked against her.
“My goal is to develop bridges rather than confront and escalate the conflict, she claims.”
“I engaged in mediation with people who had committed serious crimes while I was a judge. I was able to communicate with them through football, which has the strongest anti-discrimination and inclusiveness forces. Hence, it would be absurd for me to enter and make accusations. I am very aware of football’s difficulties. These are really large, so moving forward won’t be much simpler.
“Football is a huge passion in my life, thus I am running for this office with nothing to lose. It’s worth trying because it’s a little personal. Someone else can take the following run if I don’t make it. Otherwise, I’ll try again.”
Women Football World Cup 2023 fans can buy Women Football World Cup Tickets from our website.